Framework

Risk-adjusted performance measures

The question it answers

When choosing between two funds, how can an investor tell whether the one with higher returns owes it to the manager's skill or simply to taking more risk?

Origin
Sharpe (1966); Treynor (1965); Jensen (1968); Sortino and Price (1994); Modigliani and Modigliani (1997)
Diagram type
Comparison table
Level of analysis
Individual
Stack of clay coins beside a rising glass bar chart, icon for finance

Diagram

Risk-adjusted performance measures

CriterionRisk usedReads as
Sharpe ratioTotal riskExcess return per unit of volatility
Treynor ratioBetaExcess return per unit of market risk
Jensen's alphaBetaReturn above CAPM
Sortino ratioDownside deviationPenalises only losses
M²Total riskReturn restated at market volatility

Sources

References

Listed A–Z by author surname, Harvard style. A source with a DOI links to https://doi.org/…; one without links to its page or says plainly that it has no DOI.

  1. Jensen, M.C. (1968) ‘The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964’, Journal of Finance, 23(2), pp. 389–416.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00815.xSource page
  2. Modigliani, F. and Modigliani, L. (1997) ‘Risk-adjusted performance’, Journal of Portfolio Management, 23(2), pp. 45–54.doi:10.3905/jpm.23.2.45Source page
  3. Sharpe, W.F. (1966) ‘Mutual fund performance’, Journal of Business, 39(1, Part 2), pp. 119–138.doi:10.1086/294846Source page
  4. Sortino, F.A. and Price, L.N. (1994) ‘Performance measurement in a downside risk framework’, Journal of Investing, 3(3), pp. 59–64.doi:10.3905/joi.3.3.59Source page
  5. Treynor, J.L. (1965) ‘How to rate management of investment funds’, Harvard Business Review, 43(1), pp. 63–75.No DOISource page