Framework
Aggregate planning strategies
The question it answers
A production manager facing seasonal swings in demand must choose between hiring, overtime, subcontracting and building stock: which mix costs least across the planning periods?
- Origin
- Chopra, 2019, ch. 8; Slack et al., 2022, ch. 11
- Diagram type
- Comparison table
- Level of analysis
- Firm

Diagram
Aggregate planning strategies
| Criterion | Chase: follow demand | Flexibility: vary hours | Level: steady output | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce | Varies with demand (hire, lay off, add or idle machines) | Stable, hours worked vary | Stable, constant output rate | Partly adjusted |
| Inventory | Low | Low, but lower machine utilisation | Builds and drains with the season, may carry backlog | Depends on the mix |
| Main tools | Hiring and firing, adding or idling machines | Overtime, flexible schedules | Stockpiling, carrying backlog | All three combined |
| Fits when | Holding stock is costly and changing capacity is cheap | Holding stock is costly, machines have spare capacity and staff accept flexible schedules | Holding and backlog costs are low | Most real cases |
When to use it, and when not to
Use it when
Choose the cheapest feasible option after costing each period.
Pitfalls
Pitfall
Applying one pure strategy to every product line. Slack et al. note that a level capacity plan suits neither perishable goods, fast-changing fashion lines nor made-to-order products. Chopra adds that hiring and laying off to follow demand hurts morale and is hard to do at short notice, so planners usually settle on a hybrid.
Sources
References
Listed A–Z by author surname, Harvard style. A source with a DOI links to https://doi.org/…; one without links to its page or says plainly that it has no DOI.
- Chopra, S. (2019) Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation (7th global edn). Harlow: Pearson.No DOIpearson.comCited in 4 articles
- Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A. and Burgess, N. (2022) Operations Management (10th edn). Harlow: Pearson.No DOIpearson.comCited in 3 articles