Đạo đức & quản trị công ty

Tài liệu tham khảo

Xếp A–Z theo họ tác giả, kiểu Harvard. Nguồn có DOI thì link https://doi.org/…; nguồn không có DOI thì link trang nguồn hoặc ghi rõ không có DOI.

1. Acharya, V.V. et al. (2011) Market failures and regulatory failures: lessons from past and present financial crises. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI Working Paper 264).Không có DOIadb.orgTrang nguồn
2. Banerjee, S.B. (2008) ‘Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly’, Critical Sociology, 34(1), pp. 51–79.doi:10.1177/0896920507084623Trang nguồn
3. Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (2000) Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review.Không có DOIhbr.orgTrang nguồn
4. Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Không có DOITrang nguồn
5. Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. (2004) ‘Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination’, American Economic Review, 94(4), pp. 991–1013.doi:10.1257/0002828042002561Trang nguồn
6. Bertrand, M., Chugh, D. and Mullainathan, S. (2005) ‘Implicit discrimination’, American Economic Review, 95(2), pp. 94–98.doi:10.1257/000282805774670365Trang nguồn
7. Boatright, J.R. (2010) ‘Executive compensation: unjust or just right?’, in The Oxford handbook of business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 161–201.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307955.003.0007Trang nguồn
8. Carroll, A.B. (1991) ‘The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34(4), pp. 39–48.doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-gTrang nguồn
9. Cleveland, W.S. and McGill, R. (1984) ‘Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), pp. 531–554.doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080Trang nguồn
10. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013) Internal Control – Integrated Framework.Không có DOIcoso.orgTrang nguồn
11. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2017) Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance.Không có DOIcoso.orgTrang nguồn
12. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, c. 48 (1988).Không có DOIlegislation.gov.ukTrang nguồn
13. Coyle, D. (2017) ‘Precarious and productive work in the digital economy’, National Institute Economic Review, 240(1), pp. R5–R14.doi:10.1177/002795011724000110Trang nguồn
14. Dietsch, P. (2008) ‘Distributive lessons from division of labour’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 5(1), pp. 96–117.doi:10.1163/174552408x306744Trang nguồn
15. Donaldson, L. and Davis, J.H. (1991) ‘Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns’, Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), pp. 49–64.doi:10.1177/031289629101600103Trang nguồn
16. Elkington, J. (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.Không có DOITrang nguồn
17. Elkington, J. (2018) 25 years ago I coined the phrase ‘triple bottom line’. Here's why it's time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review.Không có DOIhbr.orgTrang nguồn
18. European Institute for Gender Equality (2019) Parental-leave policies, in Gender Equality Index 2019: work-life balance. Vilnius: EIGE.Không có DOIeige.europa.euTrang nguồn
19. Ferretti, T. (2020) ‘A liberal egalitarian perspective on the platform economy: mitigating its distributive effects or changing the organizations running it?’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 51(1), pp. 54–79.doi:10.1111/josp.12330Trang nguồn
20. Ferretti, T. (2022) ‘An institutionalist approach to AI ethics: justifying the priority of government regulation over self-regulation’, Moral Philosophy and Politics, 9(2), pp. 239–265.doi:10.1515/mopp-2020-0056Trang nguồn
21. Ferretti, T. (2024) ‘Value alignment without institutional change cannot prevent the societal risks of artificial intelligence’, LSE Public Policy Review, 3(3), article 2.doi:10.31389/lseppr.113Trang nguồn
22. Frazier, M.L. et al. (2017) ‘Psychological safety: a meta-analytic review and extension’, Personnel Psychology, 70(1), pp. 113–165.doi:10.1111/peps.12183Trang nguồn
23. Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139192675Trang nguồn
24. Freeman, R.E. and McVea, J. (2001) A stakeholder approach to strategic management. SSRN (Darden Graduate School of Business Administration Working Paper No. 01-02).doi:10.2139/ssrn.263511Trang nguồn
25. Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015) ‘ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies’, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), pp. 210–233.doi:10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917Trang nguồn
26. Friedman, M. (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.Không có DOInytimes.comTrang nguồn
27. GRI, UN Global Compact and WBCSD (2015) SDG Compass: the guide for business action on the SDGs.Không có DOIglobalcompact.deTrang nguồn
28. Heath, J. (2006) ‘Business ethics without stakeholders’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), pp. 533–557.doi:10.5840/beq200616448Trang nguồn
29. Heath, J. (2014) Morality, competition, and the firm: the market failures approach to business ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199990481.001.0001Trang nguồn
30. Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M. and Sarkis, J. (2005) ‘Performance measurement for green supply chain management’, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), pp. 330–353.doi:10.1108/14635770510609015Trang nguồn
31. Hsieh, N. (2009) ‘Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions?’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 251–273.doi:10.5840/beq200919213Trang nguồn
32. International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO 31000:2018 Risk management – Guidelines.Không có DOIiso.orgTrang nguồn
33. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305–360.doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-xTrang nguồn
34. Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Không có DOITrang nguồn
35. Kates, M. (2015) ‘The ethics of sweatshops and the limits of choice’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(2), pp. 191–212.doi:10.1017/beq.2015.9Trang nguồn
36. Keiser, N.L. and Arthur, W. (2021) ‘A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), pp. 1007–1032.doi:10.1037/apl0000821Trang nguồn
37. Kidder, R.M. (1995) How good people make tough choices. New York: William Morrow.Không có DOITrang nguồn
38. Li, X. and Olorunniwo, F. (2008) ‘An exploration of reverse logistics practices in three companies’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(5), pp. 381–386.doi:10.1108/13598540810894979Trang nguồn
39. Lipsey, R.G. and Lancaster, K. (1956) ‘The general theory of second best’, The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), pp. 11–32.doi:10.2307/2296233Trang nguồn
40. Louche, C. and Lydenberg, S. (2010) ‘Responsible investing’, in Boatright, J.R. (ed.) Finance ethics: critical issues in theory and practice. Wiley, pp. 393–417.doi:10.1002/9781118266298.ch21Trang nguồn
41. Martin, R.L. and Osberg, S. (2007) ‘Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), pp. 28–39.Không có DOIssir.orgTrang nguồn
42. Mendelow, A.L. (1981) ‘Environmental scanning—the impact of the stakeholder concept’, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1981), Cambridge, MA.Không có DOIaisel.aisnet.orgTrang nguồn
43. Miller, K. (2020) The triple bottom line: what it is & why it's important. Harvard Business School Online, Business Insights blog, 8 December 2020 (updated 16 August 2023).Không có DOIonline.hbs.eduTrang nguồn
44. Montiel, I. et al. (2021) ‘Implementing the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals in international business’, Journal of International Business Studies, 52(5), pp. 999–1030.doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00445-yTrang nguồn
45. Moradi, P. and Levy, K. (2020) ‘The future of work in the age of AI: displacement or risk-shifting?’, in The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 270–288.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.17Trang nguồn
46. Moriarty, J. (2009) ‘How much compensation can CEOs permissibly accept?’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 235–250.doi:10.5840/beq200919212Trang nguồn
47. Norman, W. and MacDonald, C. (2004) ‘Getting to the bottom of "triple bottom line"’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), pp. 243–262.doi:10.5840/beq200414211Trang nguồn
48. Patents Act 1977, c. 37 (1977).Không có DOIlegislation.gov.ukTrang nguồn
49. Post, C. et al. (2022) ‘Participative or directive leadership behaviors for decision-making in crisis management teams?’, Small Group Research, 53(5), pp. 692–724.doi:10.1177/10464964221087952Trang nguồn
50. Rachels, J. and Rachels, S. (2012) The elements of moral philosophy (7th edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.Không có DOITrang nguồn
51. Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as fairness: a restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.doi:10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0Trang nguồn
52. Scanlon, T.M. (2013) ‘Giving desert its due’, Philosophical Explorations, 16(2), pp. 101–116.doi:10.1080/13869795.2013.787437Trang nguồn
53. Schor, J. (2014) Debating the sharing economy. Great Transition Initiative.Không có DOIgreattransition.orgTrang nguồn
54. Sen, A. (1999) ‘Democracy as a universal value’, Journal of Democracy, 10(3), pp. 3–17.doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055Trang nguồn
55. Sen, A. (2006) ‘Development as freedom: an India perspective’, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(2), pp. 157–169.Không có DOIjstor.orgTrang nguồn
56. Seuring, S. and Müller, M. (2008) ‘From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), pp. 1699–1710.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020Trang nguồn
57. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997) ‘A survey of corporate governance’, Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp. 737–783.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.xTrang nguồn
58. Singer, A. (2018) ‘Justice failure: efficiency and equality in business ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 149(1), pp. 97–115.doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3086-xTrang nguồn
59. Smith, C.W. and Stulz, R.M. (1985) ‘The determinants of firms' hedging policies’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), pp. 391–405.doi:10.2307/2330757Trang nguồn
60. Srivastava, S.K. (2007) ‘Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), pp. 53–80.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.xTrang nguồn
61. Tabassi, E. (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST AI 100-1).doi:10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1Trang nguồn
62. Tarr, D.G. (2010) ‘The political, regulatory, and market failures that caused the US financial crisis: what are the lessons?’, Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 2(2), pp. 163–186.doi:10.1108/17576381011070210Trang nguồn
63. Trade Marks Act 1994, c. 26 (1994).Không có DOIlegislation.gov.ukTrang nguồn
64. Tufte, E.R. (2001) The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Không có DOITrang nguồn
65. United Nations Global Compact (n.d.) The ten principles of the UN Global Compact.Không có DOIunglobalcompact.orgTrang nguồn
66. United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (2006) Principles for Responsible Investment.Không có DOIunpri.orgTrang nguồn
67. Van Zanten, J.A. and Van Tulder, R. (2021) ‘Improving companies' impacts on sustainable development: a nexus approach to the SDGs’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp. 3703–3720.doi:10.1002/bse.2835Trang nguồn
68. Vogel, D. (2005) The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Không có DOIbrookings.eduTrang nguồn
69. White, K., Habib, R. and Hardisty, D.J. (2019) ‘How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework’, Journal of Marketing, 83(3), pp. 22–49.doi:10.1177/0022242919825649Trang nguồn
70. Wong, B. (2011) ‘Points of view: color blindness’, Nature Methods, 8(6), p. 441.doi:10.1038/nmeth.1618Trang nguồn
71. Young, I.M. (2006) ‘Taking the basic structure seriously’, Perspectives on Politics, 4(1), pp. 91–97.doi:10.1017/s1537592706060099Trang nguồn
72. Young, I.M. (2008) ‘Structural injustice and the politics of difference’, in Intersectionality and beyond. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, pp. 289–314.doi:10.4324/9780203890882-23Trang nguồn
73. Zacks, J. and Tversky, B. (1999) ‘Bars and lines: a study of graphic communication’, Memory & Cognition, 27(6), pp. 1073–1079.doi:10.3758/BF03201236Trang nguồn
74. Zsidisin, G.A. and Siferd, S.P. (2001) ‘Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory development’, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(1), pp. 61–73.doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00007-1Trang nguồn
75. Zwolinski, M. (2007) ‘Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 689–727.doi:10.5840/beq20071745Trang nguồn