Khởi nghiệp & đổi mới

Tài liệu tham khảo

Xếp A–Z theo họ tác giả, kiểu Harvard. Nguồn có DOI thì link https://doi.org/…; nguồn không có DOI thì link trang nguồn hoặc ghi rõ không có DOI.

1. Alvarez, S.A. and Barney, J.B. (2007) ‘Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), pp. 11–26.doi:10.1002/sej.4Trang nguồn
2. Ansoff, H.I. (1957) ‘Strategies for diversification’, Harvard Business Review, 35(5), pp. 113–124.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
3. Ansoff, H.I. (1965) Corporate strategy: an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
4. Barringer, B.R. and Ireland, R.D. (2018) Entrepreneurship: successfully launching new ventures (6th edn). Pearson.Không có DOIpearson.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
5. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) ‘The era of open innovation’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), pp. 35–41.Không có DOIsloanreview.mit.eduTrang nguồn
6. Chetty, S. and Agndal, H. (2007) ‘Social capital and its influence on changes in internationalization mode among small and medium-sized enterprises’, Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), pp. 1–29.doi:10.1509/jimk.15.1.001Trang nguồn
7. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H. and Sharma, P. (2005) ‘Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), pp. 555–575.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.xĐược trích trong 1 bài
8. Christensen, C.M. et al. (2018) ‘Disruptive innovation: an intellectual history and directions for future research’, Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), pp. 1043–1078.doi:10.1111/joms.12349Được trích trong 1 bài
9. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, c. 48 (1988).Không có DOIlegislation.gov.ukTrang nguồn
10. Coviello, N.E. and Munro, H.J. (1997) ‘Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms’, International Business Review, 6(4), pp. 361–386.doi:10.1016/s0969-5931(97)00010-3Trang nguồn
11. Coyle, D. (2017) ‘Precarious and productive work in the digital economy’, National Institute Economic Review, 240(1), pp. R5–R14.doi:10.1177/002795011724000110Được trích trong 1 bài
12. Cress, L. (2025) 'Vibe coding' named word of the year by Collins Dictionary. BBC News.Không có DOIbbc.comTrang nguồn
13. Cunliff, E. (2004) ‘Connecting systems thinking and action’, The Systems Thinker, 15(2), pp. 7–10.Không có DOIthesystemsthinker.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
14. Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (2010) ‘Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: convergences and divergences’, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), pp. 32–53.doi:10.1080/19420670903442053Được trích trong 1 bài
15. Dess, G.G., McNamara, G. and Eisner, A.B. (2016) Strategic management: text and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Không có DOITrang nguồn
16. Dunning, J.H. (1980) ‘Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests’, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), pp. 9–31.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593Được trích trong 1 bài
17. Dunning, J.H. (1988) ‘The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), pp. 1–31.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490372Được trích trong 4 bài
18. Ferretti, T. (2020) ‘A liberal egalitarian perspective on the platform economy: mitigating its distributive effects or changing the organizations running it?’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 51(1), pp. 54–79.doi:10.1111/josp.12330Được trích trong 1 bài
19. Göcke, L. and Meier, P. (2021) ‘Development and validation of platform businesses in digital entrepreneurship’, in Digital entrepreneurship: impact on business and society. Cham: Springer, pp. 87–102.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53914-6_5Được trích trong 2 bài
20. Gómez-Mejía, L.R. et al. (2007) ‘Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), pp. 106–137.doi:10.2189/asqu.52.1.106Được trích trong 1 bài
21. Goodman, M. (1997) ‘Systems thinking: what, why, when, where, and how?’, The Systems Thinker, 8(2), pp. 6–7.Không có DOIthesystemsthinker.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
22. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360–1380.doi:10.1086/225469Trang nguồn
23. Jacobides, M.G., Knudsen, T. and Augier, M. (2006) ‘Benefiting from innovation: value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures’, Research Policy, 35(8), pp. 1200–1221.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.005Được trích trong 1 bài
24. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977) ‘The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), pp. 23–32.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676Được trích trong 5 bài
25. Johanson, J. and Mattsson, L.-G. (1988) ‘Internationalisation in industrial systems: a network approach’, in Strategies in global competition. London: Croom Helm, pp. 287–314.Không có DOIopenlibrary.orgTrang nguồn
26. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1990) ‘The mechanism of internationalisation’, International Marketing Review, 7(4), pp. 11–24.doi:10.1108/02651339010137414Trang nguồn
27. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.Không có DOITrang nguồn
28. Kafouros, M.I. (2008) Industrial innovation and firm performance: the impact of scientific knowledge on multinational corporations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.doi:10.4337/9781781956380Trang nguồn
29. Le Breton-Miller, I. and Miller, D. (2009) ‘Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: a social embeddedness reconciliation’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), pp. 1169–1191.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00339.xĐược trích trong 1 bài
30. Martin, R.L. and Osberg, S. (2007) ‘Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), pp. 28–39.Không có DOIssir.orgĐược trích trong 1 bài
31. McCarthy, D.M., Fader, P.S. and Hardie, B.G.S. (2017) ‘Valuing subscription-based businesses using publicly disclosed customer data’, Journal of Marketing, 81(1), pp. 17–35.doi:10.1509/jm.15.0519Được trích trong 1 bài
32. McDougall, P.P., Shane, S. and Oviatt, B.M. (1994) ‘Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research’, Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), pp. 469–487.doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)90017-5Được trích trong 1 bài
33. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D. and Hillier, J. (2013) ‘Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice’, in The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 13–24.doi:10.4337/9781849809993.00011Trang nguồn
34. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) ‘Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp. 242–266.doi:10.2307/259373Trang nguồn
35. Nazir, M.A., Roomi, M.A. and Khan, M.R. (2025) ‘Entrepreneurial firms in the crypto era: adoption trajectories and innovation dynamics’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(8), pp. 18–53.doi:10.1108/JSBED-11-2024-0580Trang nguồn
36. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. and Tucci, C.L. (2005) ‘Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, pp. 1–25.doi:10.17705/1CAIS.01601Được trích trong 2 bài
37. Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010) Business model generation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 3 bài
38. Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. (1994) ‘Toward a theory of international new ventures’, Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), pp. 45–64.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193Được trích trong 3 bài
39. Patents Act 1977, c. 37 (1977).Không có DOIlegislation.gov.ukTrang nguồn
40. Penrose, E.T. (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Không có DOIopenlibrary.orgTrang nguồn
41. Philippon, T. (2016) The FinTech opportunity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper No. 22476).doi:10.3386/w22476Trang nguồn
42. Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001) ‘Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency’, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp. 243–263.doi:10.2307/259121Trang nguồn
43. Schor, J. (2014) Debating the sharing economy. Great Transition Initiative.Không có DOIgreattransition.orgĐược trích trong 1 bài
44. Schumpeter, J.A. (1947) ‘The creative response in economic history’, The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), pp. 149–159.doi:10.1017/S0022050700054279Được trích trong 2 bài
45. Simon, H.A. (2000) ‘Public administration in today's world of organizations and markets’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 33(4), pp. 749–756.doi:10.2307/420911Trang nguồn
46. Social Business Pedia (2015) The seven principles of social business.Không có DOIsocialbusinesspedia.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
47. Soltanifar, M., Hughes, M. and Göcke, L. (2021) Digital entrepreneurship: impact on business and society. Cham: Springer.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53914-6Được trích trong 1 bài
48. Stokes, D. (2000) ‘Putting entrepreneurship into marketing: the processes of entrepreneurial marketing’, Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), pp. 1–16.doi:10.1108/14715200080001536Trang nguồn
49. Teece, D.J. (1986) ‘Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy’, Research Policy, 15(6), pp. 285–305.doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2Được trích trong 1 bài
50. Teece, D.J. (2007) ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp. 1319–1350.doi:10.1002/smj.640Được trích trong 1 bài
51. Trade Marks Act 1994, c. 26 (1994).Không có DOIlegislation.gov.ukTrang nguồn
52. UK Crowdfunding Association (n.d.) What is crowdfunding?Không có DOIukcfa.org.ukĐược trích trong 1 bài
53. Uzzi, B. (1997) ‘Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), pp. 35–67.doi:10.2307/2393808Trang nguồn
54. Uzzi, B. and Dunlap, S. (2005) ‘How to build your network’, Harvard Business Review, 83(12), pp. 53–60.Không có DOIhbr.orgTrang nguồn
55. Vahlne, J.-E. and Johanson, J. (2017) ‘From internationalization to evolution: the Uppsala model at 40 years’, Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), pp. 1087–1102.doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0107-7Được trích trong 1 bài
56. Verbeke, A. and Kano, L. (2012) ‘The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), pp. 1183–1205.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.xĐược trích trong 1 bài
57. Weihrich, H. (1982) ‘The TOWS matrix: a tool for situational analysis’, Long Range Planning, 15(2), pp. 54–66.doi:10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0Được trích trong 1 bài
58. Williamson, O.E. (1981) ‘The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), pp. 548–577.doi:10.1086/227496Được trích trong 1 bài
59. Yoder, S., Visich, J.K. and Rustambekov, E. (2016) ‘Lessons learned from international expansion failures and successes’, Business Horizons, 59, pp. 233–243.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.11.008Được trích trong 2 bài
60. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B. and Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010) ‘Building social business models: lessons from the Grameen experience’, Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), pp. 308–325.doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005Được trích trong 1 bài
61. Zucchella, A., Hagen, B. and Serapio, M.G. (2018) International entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Không có DOIe-elgar.comTrang nguồn