Tư vấn doanh nghiệp

Tài liệu tham khảo

Xếp A–Z theo họ tác giả, kiểu Harvard. Nguồn có DOI thì link https://doi.org/…; nguồn không có DOI thì link trang nguồn hoặc ghi rõ không có DOI.

1. Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S. and Senior, B. (2007) ‘Belbin's team role model: development, validity and applications for team building’, Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), pp. 96–118.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00666.xĐược trích trong 1 bài
2. Asquer, A. (2012) ‘What is corporate diplomacy? And why does it matter?’, Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(3), pp. 53–63.Không có DOIdoi.orgĐược trích trong 1 bài
3. Balogun, J. and Hailey, V.H. (1999) Exploring Strategic Change. London: Prentice Hall.Không có DOITrang nguồn
4. Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.doi:10.1177/014920639101700108Được trích trong 1 bài
5. Barney, J.B. (1995) ‘Looking inside for competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), pp. 49–61.doi:10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192Được trích trong 1 bài
6. Barringer, B.R. and Ireland, R.D. (2018) Entrepreneurship: successfully launching new ventures (6th edn). Pearson.Không có DOIpearson.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
7. Bolewski, W. (2018) ‘Corporate diplomacy as global management’, International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 4(2), pp. 107–138.doi:10.1504/ijdipe.2018.094089Được trích trong 1 bài
8. Cairo, A. (2019) How charts lie: getting smarter about visual information. New York: W.W. Norton.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
9. Conn, C. and McLean, R. (2019) Bulletproof problem solving: the one skill that changes everything. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Không có DOIwiley.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
10. Elliott, B. and Elliott, J. (2019) Financial Accounting and Reporting, 19th edn. Harlow: Pearson.Không có DOITrang nguồn
11. Gigerenzer, G. et al. (2007) ‘Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), pp. 53–96.doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.xĐược trích trong 2 bài
12. Henisz, W.J. (2016) ‘The dynamic capability of corporate diplomacy’, Global Strategy Journal, 6(3), pp. 183–196.doi:10.1002/gsj.1121Được trích trong 1 bài
13. Hiatt, J.M. (2006) ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government and Our Community. Loveland, CO: Prosci Learning Center Publications.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
14. James Bell Associates (2018) Guide to data-driven decision making: using data to inform practice and policy decisions in child welfare organizations. Washington, DC: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Không có DOIjbassoc.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
15. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.Không có DOITrang nguồn
16. Johnson, G., Whittington, R. and Scholes, K. (2011) Exploring Strategy. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Không có DOITrang nguồn
17. Kotter, J.P. (1995) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review.Không có DOIhbr.orgĐược trích trong 3 bài
18. Minto, B. (2009) The pyramid principle: logic in writing and thinking. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Không có DOITrang nguồn
19. Moschieri, C., Ravasi, D. and Huy, Q. (2024) ‘Why do some multinational firms respond better than others to the hostility of host governments? Proximal embedding and the side effects of local partnerships’, Journal of Management Studies, 61(2), pp. 627–685.doi:10.1111/joms.12809Được trích trong 2 bài
20. Oakland, J.S. and Tanner, S.J. (2007) ‘A new framework for managing change’, The TQM Magazine, 19(6), pp. 572–589.doi:10.1108/09544780710828421Trang nguồn
21. Odeh, G. (2021) ‘Implementing McKinsey 7S model of organizational diagnosis and planned change, Best Western Italy case analysis’, Journal of International Business and Management, 11(4), pp. 1–8.doi:10.37227/JIBM-2021-09-1438Được trích trong 1 bài
22. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. and Tucci, C.L. (2005) ‘Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, pp. 1–25.doi:10.17705/1CAIS.01601Được trích trong 2 bài
23. Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010) Business model generation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 3 bài
24. Porter, M.E. (1979) ‘How competitive forces shape strategy’, Harvard Business Review, 57(2), pp. 137–145.Không có DOIhbr.orgĐược trích trong 1 bài
25. Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
26. Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Không có DOIloc.govTrang nguồn
27. Porter, M.E. (2008) ‘The five competitive forces that shape strategy’, Harvard Business Review, 86(1), pp. 78–93.Không có DOIhbr.orgĐược trích trong 3 bài
28. Soliman, M.T. (2008) ‘The use of DuPont analysis by market participants’, The Accounting Review, 83(3), pp. 823–853.doi:10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.823Trang nguồn
29. Teece, D.J. (2007) ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp. 1319–1350.doi:10.1002/smj.640Được trích trong 1 bài
30. Tufte, E.R. (2001) The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
31. Umbrex (n.d.) McKinsey approach to problem solving. Umbrex.Không có DOIumbrex.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
32. Waterman, R.H., Peters, T.J. and Phillips, J.R. (1980) ‘Structure is not organization’, Business Horizons, 23(3), pp. 14–26.doi:10.1016/0007-6813(80)90027-0Trang nguồn
33. Weihrich, H. (1982) ‘The TOWS matrix: a tool for situational analysis’, Long Range Planning, 15(2), pp. 54–66.doi:10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0Được trích trong 1 bài
34. Whittington, R. et al. (2023) Exploring strategy: text and cases. Harlow: Pearson.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
35. Wilson, J.M. (2003) ‘Gantt charts: a centenary appreciation’, European Journal of Operational Research, 149(2), pp. 430–437.doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00769-5Trang nguồn