Dữ liệu & phân tích

Tài liệu tham khảo

Xếp A–Z theo họ tác giả, kiểu Harvard. Nguồn có DOI thì link https://doi.org/…; nguồn không có DOI thì link trang nguồn hoặc ghi rõ không có DOI.

1. Berk, J. and DeMarzo, P. (2024) Corporate Finance, 6th edn. Harlow: Pearson.Không có DOITrang nguồn
2. Binns, R. (2018) ‘Fairness in machine learning: lessons from political philosophy’, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. pp. 149–159.Không có DOIproceedings.mlr.pressĐược trích trong 1 bài
3. Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M. (1976) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, rev. edn. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Không có DOITrang nguồn
4. Buehler, R., Griffin, D. and Ross, M. (1994) ‘Exploring the 'planning fallacy': why people underestimate their task completion times’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), pp. 366–381.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366Được trích trong 1 bài
5. Cairo, A. (2016) The truthful art: data, charts, and maps for communication. San Francisco: New Riders.Không có DOITrang nguồn
6. Cairo, A. (2019) How charts lie: getting smarter about visual information. New York: W.W. Norton.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
7. Chaffey, D. and Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019) Digital marketing: strategy, implementation and practice. Harlow: Pearson.Không có DOITrang nguồn
8. Chopra, S. (2019) Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation (7th global edn). Harlow: Pearson.Không có DOIpearson.comĐược trích trong 4 bài
9. Cleveland, W.S. and McGill, R. (1984) ‘Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), pp. 531–554.doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080Trang nguồn
10. Dalkey, N. and Helmer, O. (1963) ‘An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts’, Management Science, 9(3), pp. 458–467.doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458Trang nguồn
11. Dattner, B. et al. (2019) The legal and ethical implications of using AI in hiring. Harvard Business Review.Không có DOIhbr.orgĐược trích trong 1 bài
12. De Veaux, R.D. and Hand, D.J. (2005) ‘How to lie with bad data’, Statistical Science, 20(3), pp. 231–238.doi:10.1214/088342305000000269Trang nguồn
13. Drake, W.J., Cerf, V.G. and Kleinwächter, W. (2016) Internet fragmentation: an overview. Geneva: World Economic Forum (Future of the Internet Initiative White Paper).Không có DOIwww3.weforum.orgTrang nguồn
14. Dwork, C. et al. (2012) ‘Fairness through awareness’, in Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference. New York: ACM, pp. 214–226.doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255Được trích trong 1 bài
15. European Parliament and Council (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union.Không có DOIeur-lex.europa.euĐược trích trong 3 bài
16. Fairfield, J.A.T. and Engel, C. (2015) ‘Privacy as a public good’, Duke Law Journal, 65(3), pp. 385–457.Không có DOIscholarship.law.duke.eduĐược trích trong 2 bài
17. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) ‘From Nobel Prize to project management: getting risks right’, Project Management Journal, 37(3), pp. 5–15.doi:10.1177/875697280603700302Được trích trong 1 bài
18. Gigerenzer, G. et al. (2007) ‘Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), pp. 53–96.doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.xĐược trích trong 2 bài
19. Greenland, S. et al. (2016) ‘Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations’, European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), pp. 337–350.doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3Được trích trong 1 bài
20. Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1998) ‘The hidden traps in decision making’, Harvard Business Review, 76(5).Không có DOIhbr.orgĐược trích trong 2 bài
21. Higgins, R.C. (1977) ‘How much growth can a firm afford?’, Financial Management, 6(3), pp. 7–16.doi:10.2307/3665251Trang nguồn
22. Hoffmann, S., Lazanski, D. and Taylor, E. (2020) ‘Standardising the splinternet: how China's technical standards could fragment the internet’, Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(2), pp. 239–264.doi:10.1080/23738871.2020.1805482Trang nguồn
23. Hope, J. and Fraser, R. (2003) Beyond Budgeting: How Managers Can Break Free from the Annual Performance Trap. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Không có DOITrang nguồn
24. Huang, M.-H. and Rust, R.T. (2021) ‘A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), pp. 30–50.doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9Trang nguồn
25. Hyndman, R.J. and Athanasopoulos, G. (2021) Forecasting: principles and practice (3rd edn). Melbourne: OTexts.Không có DOIotexts.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
26. Hyndman, R.J. and Athanasopoulos, G. (2021) Forecasting: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn.Không có DOIotexts.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
27. Illowsky, B. and Dean, S. (2023) Introductory statistics 2e. Houston, Texas: OpenStax.Không có DOIopenstax.orgĐược trích trong 1 bài
28. James, G. et al. (2021) An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R (2nd edn). New York: Springer.doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1Được trích trong 1 bài
29. James Bell Associates (2018) Guide to data-driven decision making: using data to inform practice and policy decisions in child welfare organizations. Washington, DC: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Không có DOIjbassoc.comĐược trích trong 1 bài
30. Jansen, B.J. et al. (2022) ‘The illusion of data validity: why numbers about people are likely wrong’, Data and Information Management, 6(4), article 100020.doi:10.1016/j.dim.2022.100020Được trích trong 1 bài
31. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.Không có DOITrang nguồn
32. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263–291.doi:10.2307/1914185Được trích trong 1 bài
33. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992) ‘The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance’, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), pp. 71–79.Không có DOIhbr.orgTrang nguồn
34. Kim, J., Kim, D.H. and Kwak, S.G. (2024) ‘Comprehensive guidelines for appropriate statistical analysis methods in research’, Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 77(5), pp. 503–517.doi:10.4097/kja.24016Trang nguồn
35. Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S. and Raghavan, M. (2017) ‘Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores’, in 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017), LIPIcs 67. pp. 43:1–43:23.doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.43Được trích trong 1 bài
36. Knaflic, C.N. (2015) Storytelling with data: a data visualization guide for business professionals. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Không có DOITrang nguồn
37. Kohavi, R., Tang, D. and Xu, Y. (2020) Trustworthy online controlled experiments: a practical guide to A/B testing. Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/9781108653985Được trích trong 1 bài
38. Lane, D.M. (n.d.) Steps in hypothesis testing. Online Statistics Education: an interactive multimedia course of study (Rice University, University of Houston Clear Lake and Tufts University).Không có DOIonlinestatbook.comTrang nguồn
39. Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997) ‘Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect’, Management Science, 43(4), pp. 546–558.doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546Được trích trong 1 bài
40. Lemon, K.N. and Verhoef, P.C. (2016) ‘Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey’, Journal of Marketing, 80(6), pp. 69–96.doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420Được trích trong 1 bài
41. Lepenioti, K. et al. (2020) ‘Prescriptive analytics: literature review and research challenges’, International Journal of Information Management, 50, pp. 57–70.doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003Được trích trong 1 bài
42. Libai, B. et al. (2020) ‘Brave new world? On AI and the management of customer relationships’, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 51, pp. 44–56.doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.002Trang nguồn
43. Lichtenstein, S. and Fischhoff, B. (1977) ‘Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), pp. 159–183.doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0Trang nguồn
44. Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S.C. and Hyndman, R.J. (1998) Forecasting: Methods and Applications, 3rd edn. New York: Wiley.Không có DOITrang nguồn
45. Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E. and Assimakopoulos, V. (2018) ‘Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: concerns and ways forward’, PLOS ONE, 13(3), article e0194889.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194889Trang nguồn
46. Mayer, M. and Nock, P.J. (2025) ‘Editorial: Digital fragmentations, technological sovereignty and new perspectives on the global digital political economy’, Global Political Economy, 4(1), pp. 2–13.doi:10.1332/26352257Y2024D000000029Trang nguồn
47. Meadows, D.H. (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Không có DOITrang nguồn
48. Nissenbaum, H. (2010) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.doi:10.1515/9780804772891Được trích trong 1 bài
49. Nocetti, J. (2024) A splintered internet? Internet fragmentation and the strategies of China, Russia, India and the European Union. Paris: Ifri (Études de l'Ifri, February 2024).Không có DOIifri.orgTrang nguồn
50. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763Trang nguồn
51. Palm, E. (2009) ‘Securing privacy at work: the importance of contextualized consent’, Ethics and Information Technology, 11(4), pp. 233–241.doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9208-8Được trích trong 1 bài
52. Park, M.J. (2017) ‘Why evaluate organizational change efforts?’, in Evaluating organization development: how to ensure and sustain the successful transformation. Productivity Press, pp. 1–30.doi:10.1201/b21877-1Được trích trong 1 bài
53. Petropoulos, F. et al. (2022) ‘Forecasting: theory and practice’, International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), pp. 705–871.doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001Trang nguồn
54. Rist, R.C., Boily, M.-H. and Martin, F. (2011) Influencing Change: Building Evaluation Capacity to Strengthen Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank.doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8403-9Được trích trong 1 bài
55. Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1995) ‘Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking’, Sloan Management Review, 36(2), pp. 25–40.Không có DOIshop.sloanreview.mit.eduĐược trích trong 1 bài
56. Starbucks Corporation (2020) Business update (8 April). SEC EDGAR, Exhibit 99.1 (Press release).Không có DOIsec.govĐược trích trong 1 bài
57. Starbucks Corporation (2020) Starbucks reports Q4 fiscal 2020 results (29 October). SEC EDGAR, Exhibit 99.1 (Press release).Không có DOIsec.govĐược trích trong 1 bài
58. Tufte, E.R. (2001) The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
59. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases’, Science, 185(4157), pp. 1124–1131.doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Trang nguồn
60. Wack, P. (1985) ‘Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead’, Harvard Business Review, 63(5), pp. 73–89.Không có DOIhbr.orgĐược trích trong 2 bài
61. Wedel, M. and Kannan, P.K. (2016) ‘Marketing analytics for data-rich environments’, Journal of Marketing, 80(6), pp. 97–121.doi:10.1509/jm.15.0413Được trích trong 2 bài
62. Welch, I. (1992) ‘Sequential sales, learning, and cascades’, Journal of Finance, 47(2), pp. 695–732.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04406.xTrang nguồn
63. Whittington, R. et al. (2023) Exploring strategy: text and cases. Harlow: Pearson.Không có DOIĐược trích trong 1 bài
64. Winters, P.R. (1960) ‘Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages’, Management Science, 6(3), pp. 324–342.doi:10.1287/mnsc.6.3.324Trang nguồn
65. Wong, B. (2011) ‘Points of view: color blindness’, Nature Methods, 8(6), p. 441.doi:10.1038/nmeth.1618Trang nguồn
66. Zacks, J. and Tversky, B. (1999) ‘Bars and lines: a study of graphic communication’, Memory & Cognition, 27(6), pp. 1073–1079.doi:10.3758/BF03201236Trang nguồn
67. Zimmermann, A., Di Rosa, E. and Kim, H. (2020) Technology can't fix algorithmic injustice. Boston Review.Không có DOIbostonreview.netĐược trích trong 1 bài